Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R7 M260X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 M260X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (1335MHz vs 715MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +646%
4.101 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M260X
0.549 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Dec 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
620 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
715 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.720 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.16 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
549.1 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Opal
-
GPU Variant
Opal PRO
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy