Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R7 M350 2GB

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M350 2GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +547%
4.101 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 M350 2GB
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Gem System(R7 M300)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
633.6 GFLOPS
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Litho
-
GPU Variant
Litho XT (216-0868010)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy