Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD FirePro W6150M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD FirePro W6150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and 4GB VRAM FirePro W6150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 88.00GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile +195%
4.884 TFLOPS
FirePro W6150M
1.651 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1455 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
88.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
768
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

76.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.20 GPixel/s
152.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.60 GTexel/s
9.769 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.884 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.651 TFLOPS
152.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Emerald
-
GPU Variant
Emerald XT GL (216-0857001)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy