Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon E8950

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon E8950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and 8GB VRAM Radeon E8950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1590MHz vs 1000MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon E8950 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile +19%
4.884 TFLOPS
Radeon E8950
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Sep 2015
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1455 MHz
Base Clock
735 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

76.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
152.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
9.769 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.096 TFLOPS
4.884 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
152.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
256.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
E8950
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy