Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 575

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro 575

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 575 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 217.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro 575 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile +8%
4.884 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 575
4.489 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1455 MHz
Base Clock
-
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1695 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
217.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
2048
96
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

76.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
35.07 GPixel/s
152.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
140.3 GTexel/s
9.769 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.489 TFLOPS
4.884 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.489 TFLOPS
152.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
280.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Polaris 20
-
GPU Variant
Polaris 20 XL (215-0910052)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy