CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD FirePro S7000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD FirePro S7000
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
AMD FirePro S7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+123%
5.437 TFLOPS
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
VS
FirePro S7000
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
1536
Shading Units
1280
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Pitcairn
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Board Design
120W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6530
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy