Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD FirePro RG220A

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1328 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 120W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 +6183%
5.027 TFLOPS
FirePro RG220A
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
1
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
80
88
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

120W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
M93
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy