Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon Pro V520

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V520 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1785MHz vs 1600MHz)
Lower TDP (120W vs 225W)
AMD Radeon Pro V520 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V520 +46%
7.373 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Dec 2020
GeForce 16
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1530 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
192bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
22
SM Count
-
1408
Shading Units
2304
88
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.4 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.75 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.373 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
460.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Navi 12
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 12
Turing
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
7 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
Unknown
284 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy