Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2260 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +1240%
0.536 TFLOPS
FireMV 2260 PCIe x1
0.04 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
FireMV 2260 PCIe x1

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
216
Shading Units
40
72
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.00 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV620
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870 Mac Edition
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 Core 512

Related News

1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy