CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 12GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock2610MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (504.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
7464 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB
+7379%
40.09 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2310 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
504.2GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
60
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
7680
72
TMUs
240
28
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
208.8 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
626.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
40.09 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
40.09 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
626.4 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD104
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
AD104-400-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
4 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
295 mm²
Board Design
171W
TDP
285W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
5
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
Related News
1
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
2
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
3
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
4
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
5
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
6
It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95
7
AMD's Strix Halo Supports Up to 128GB Memory, Clearly Designed for AI Large Language Models
8
AMD to Launch Advanced Ryzen AI PRO Series Soon
9
Intel Delays Lunar Lake Shipment: Postponed from June to September
10
Initial Test Results of AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Revealed: IPC Improvement Meets Expectations
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy