NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages

More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)

176 additional rendering cores

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages

Lower TDP (32W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +1575%

0.536 TFLOPS

FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

0.032 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

VS

FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1

Graphics Card

Nov 2008

Release Date

Jan 2009

GeForce 200

Generation

FirePro Multi-View

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x1

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

-

Boost Clock

-

999 MHz

Memory Clock

400 MHz

Memory

896MB

Memory Size

256MB

GDDR3

Memory Type

DDR3

448bit

Memory Bus

64bit

111.9GB/s

Bandwidth

6.400GB/s

Render Config

27

SM Count

-

Compute Units

2

216

Shading Units

40

72

TMUs

4

28

ROPs

4

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

L1 Cache

-

224 KB

L2 Cache

-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

1.600 GPixel/s

41.47 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

1.600 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

-

536.5 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

32.00 GFLOPS

67.07 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

GT200B

GPU Name

RV620

G200-103-B2

GPU Variant

RC620 PRO

Tesla 2.0

Architecture

TeraScale

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

55 nm

Process Size

55 nm

1.4 billion

Transistors

0.181 billion

470 mm²

Die Size

67 mm²

Board Design

171W

TDP

32W

450 W

Suggested PSU

200 W

2x DVI 1x S-Video

Outputs

1x VHDCI

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

10.1 (10_1)

3.3

OpenGL

3.3

1.1

OpenCL

N/A

Vulkan

N/A

1.3

CUDA

-

4.0

Shader Model

4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

4

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

7

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA NVS 810

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1600

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

Related News

1

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

2

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

3

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

4

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

5

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

6

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

7

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

8

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

9

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

10

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It