NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 's Advantages

Released 11 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock1680MHz

Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)

1704 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (160W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

0.536 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 +1103%

6.451 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

VS

GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

Graphics Card

Nov 2008

Release Date

Jan 2020

GeForce 200

Generation

GeForce 20

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1365 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1680 MHz

999 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

896MB

Memory Size

6GB

GDDR3

Memory Type

GDDR6

448bit

Memory Bus

192bit

111.9GB/s

Bandwidth

336.0GB/s

Render Config

27

SM Count

30

-

Compute Units

-

216

Shading Units

1920

72

TMUs

120

28

ROPs

48

-

Tensor Cores

240

-

RT Cores

30

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

224 KB

L2 Cache

3 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

80.64 GPixel/s

41.47 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

201.6 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

12.90 TFLOPS

536.5 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

6.451 TFLOPS

67.07 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

201.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B

GPU Name

TU104

G200-103-B2

GPU Variant

TU104-150-KC-A1

Tesla 2.0

Architecture

Turing

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

55 nm

Process Size

12 nm

1.4 billion

Transistors

13.6 billion

470 mm²

Die Size

545 mm²

Board Design

171W

TDP

160W

450 W

Suggested PSU

450 W

2x DVI 1x S-Video

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

CUDA

7.5

4.0

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V3750

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R5 235 OEM

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance