Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA NVS 1000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA NVS 1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM NVS 1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
24 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +75%
0.536 TFLOPS
NVS 1000
0.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
192
72
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy