Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 3450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450 's Advantages
Lower TDP (83W vs 171W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2005
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro FX Curie
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
-
72
TMUs
12
28
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.100 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
NV41
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
NV41 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.19 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
225 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
83W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy