Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5490

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5490

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 5490 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
136 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 5490 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
Lower TDP (19W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +415%
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 5490
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
Evergreen
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
216
Shading Units
80
72
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Cedar
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Cedar XTX
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
19W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy