NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 AMD Radeon RX 7700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 7700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages

Lower TDP (171W vs 200W)

AMD Radeon RX 7700 's Advantages

Released 14 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock2600MHz

Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)

2856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

0.536 TFLOPS

Radeon RX 7700 +5860%

31.95 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

VS

Radeon RX 7700

Graphics Card

Nov 2008

Release Date

Jan 2023

GeForce 200

Generation

Navi III

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1900 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2600 MHz

999 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz

Memory

896MB

Memory Size

12GB

GDDR3

Memory Type

GDDR6

448bit

Memory Bus

192bit

111.9GB/s

Bandwidth

432.0GB/s

Render Config

27

SM Count

-

Compute Units

48

216

Shading Units

3072

72

TMUs

192

28

ROPs

96

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

48

-

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

224 KB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

249.6 GPixel/s

41.47 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

499.2 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

63.90 TFLOPS

536.5 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

31.95 TFLOPS

67.07 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

998.4 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B

GPU Name

Navi 32

G200-103-B2

GPU Variant

Navi 32

Tesla 2.0

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

55 nm

Process Size

5 nm

1.4 billion

Transistors

Unknown

470 mm²

Die Size

346 mm²

Board Design

171W

TDP

200W

450 W

Suggested PSU

550 W

2x DVI 1x S-Video

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

2.2

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

CUDA

-

4.0

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 12 GB

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10 GB

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4855

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4770

Related News

1

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

2

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

3

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

4

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

5

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

6

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

7

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

8

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

9

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

10

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD