Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V3700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +737%
0.536 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Aug 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
216
Shading Units
40
72
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
RV620
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy