Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD FirePro W4000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000 +136%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
216
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Pitcairn
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy