CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 28GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 500W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
20264 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 5090
+19153%
103.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
GeForce RTX 5090
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2025
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
28GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
448bit
Memory Bus
448bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
160
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
20480
72
TMUs
640
28
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
160
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
88 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1613 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
103.2 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
103.2 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.613 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
GB202
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
GB202
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
0 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
576 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Board Design
182W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
9.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V7900
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO PCI
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6850
Related News
1
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
2
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
3
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
4
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
5
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
6
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
7
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
8
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
9
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
10
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy