Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 28GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 500W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
20264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 5090 +19153%
103.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Jan 2025
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 50
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
28GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR7
448bit
Memory Bus
448bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
160
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
20480
72
TMUs
640
28
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
160
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
88 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1613 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
103.2 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
103.2 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.613 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
GB202
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
GB202
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
0 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
576 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

182W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
9.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy