CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA PG506 232
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA PG506 232
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
NVIDIA PG506 232
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
PG506 232
+1825%
10.32 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
PG506 232
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
56
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
3584
72
TMUs
224
28
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
GA100
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
Related GPU Comparisons
1
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V7900
5
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 550X 640SP
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon R9 290X
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy