CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6450
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon HD 6450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
56 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6450 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (18W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
+168%
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6450
0.2 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
Radeon HD 6450
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
216
Shading Units
160
72
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.000 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
200.0 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
Caicos
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
Caicos PRO
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
18W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
2
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V7900
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700
7
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 SE
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
Related News
1
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
2
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
3
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
4
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
5
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
6
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
7
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
8
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
9
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
10
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy