Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1792GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 182W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV380
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy