Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD FirePro D500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD FirePro D500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
FirePro D500 +436%
2.227 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
24
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
96
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
274W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy