Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1792GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900 +85%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Turks
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy