Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (1792GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM +216%
0.415 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Sep 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GT216
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy