Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 690 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1019MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 690 +654%
3.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
May 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1019 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.61 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
130.4 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.130 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
130.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
GK104-355-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy