Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1201MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 4100 +492%
2.46 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Nov 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1125 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.22 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.86 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.460 TFLOPS
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.460 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Baffin
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Baffin XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy