Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM +94%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Oland
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy