Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X2 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X2 +1972%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Capsaicin
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT C9
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy