Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon RX 5300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon RX 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 5300 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
Radeon RX 5300 +1016%
4.632 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
May 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1327 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
96bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
168.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1408
64
TMUs
88
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.64 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
144.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
9.265 TFLOPS
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.632 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
289.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 14
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Navi 14 XE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy