Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 12GB VRAM TITAN X Pascal to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1531MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (480.4GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
TITAN X Pascal +2543%
10.97 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Aug 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1531 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
480.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
28
192
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
28
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
147.0 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
342.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
171.5 GFLOPS
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.97 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
342.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP102
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
GP102-400-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy