NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+3162%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
0 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
22 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
