CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 490
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 490
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 490
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 490 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 365W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 490 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (164.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 490
+144%
1.166 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
VS
GeForce GTX 490
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
854 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
164.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
15
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
60
28
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.24 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.48 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1166 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
145.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GF100
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
GF100-375-A3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
365W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5670
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5750
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy