CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4450
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4450
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
ATI Radeon HD 4450
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4450 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
112 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4450 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Lower TDP (25W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
+396%
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4450
0.096 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
VS
Radeon HD 4450
Graphics Card
Jul 2008
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
1
192
Shading Units
80
64
TMUs
8
28
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
RV710
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
RV710 (215-0725016)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x DisplayPort 1.0
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI Radeon HD 5750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
2
AMD Radeon HD 6570 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 GA104 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
7
NVIDIA GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB GP104
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy