Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 2100 +161%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Lexa
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Lexa PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy