Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
17984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +18990%
91.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Dec 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
142
192
Shading Units
18176
64
TMUs
568
28
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
300W
450 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
AD102
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy