Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD FirePro M5950

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD FirePro M5950

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (60.80GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
AMD FirePro M5950 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
FirePro M5950 +125%
0.696 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 200M
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
950 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

14
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
112
Shading Units
480
56
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.800 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
696.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Whistler
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
Whistler XT GL
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Board Design

65W
TDP
35W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy