Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs ATI FirePro V4900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs ATI FirePro V4900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
ATI FirePro V4900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
240 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
FirePro V4900 +13%
0.768 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
480
80
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.400 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

219W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Turks
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
Turks XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy