Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs ATI FirePro V7900 SDI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 SDI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro V7900 SDI 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 SDI +175%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
20
240
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Cayman
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

219W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy