Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 219W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +171%
1.828 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1026 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM206
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
GM206-251-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

219W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy