Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
200 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280 +1843%
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
2
240
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
RV620
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Board Design

236W
TDP
32W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy