Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD FirePro W8000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 4 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
FirePro W8000 +418%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

236W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy