Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2087MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 141.7GB/s)
3600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (200W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6800X +2477%
16.03 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Apple MPX

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2087 MHz
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
60
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
3840
80
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
128 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
200.4 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
500.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
32.06 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
16.03 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1002 GFLOPS

Board Design

236W
TDP
200W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
Apple MPX

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Navi 21
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XLA
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy