Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 280 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (141.7GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 236W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 280
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +166%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1107 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
141.7GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
240
Shading Units
640
80
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
48.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Polaris 23
G200-300-A2
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

236W
TDP
65W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy