NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA A30 PCIe
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 24GB VRAM A30 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA A30 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
A30 PCIe
+1357%
10.32 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
512bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
56
240
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
165W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GA100
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
8.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A
