NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 32GB VRAM RTX 5000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 250W)
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2550MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (576.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
12560 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
RTX 5000 Ada Generation
+9120%
65.28 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 200
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1155 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2550 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
576.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
100
240
Shading Units
12800
80
TMUs
400
32
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
400
-
RT Cores
100
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
448.8 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1020 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.28 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
65.28 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1020 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
AD102
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
AD102
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
