NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+333%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
768
80
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
25W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-128
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
