NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs AMD FirePro W7000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000
+243%
2.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Pitcairn
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
