NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1725MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1040 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
+523%
4.416 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1725 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
20
240
Shading Units
1280
80
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.20 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
138.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.832 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.416 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
138.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU116
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
TU116-250-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
