NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
+302%
2.849 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1242 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
159.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.74 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
51.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
708.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
88.56 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS
Board Design
204W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU116
G200-350-B3
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
